Double Victory on Home Education Bills

The NH House and Senate have overwhelming voted in support of two home educations bills which are expected to go before the Governor in early June.  Legislative support on these bills is sufficient to override any potential veto by the Governor.

House Bill 545 removes the requirement for home educators to notify their district or participating agency annually and replaces this provision with a one-time notification process. 

House Bill 1571 removes the requirement to submit annual evaluations for home educated children.  Evaluations of home educated children are still required, but they remain with the parents in their home.  This provides equity with private schools, which are not required to submit annual evaluations for their students. It also provides a layer of privacy for home educated children, which is particularly important given all the data mining that the federal government is conducting on students without the consent of parents. 

HB 1571 also removes the provisions for probation, grievance conferences, and termination of home programs. If there's probable cause to believe that the child is not being educated, parents can simply produce their evaluation results to demonstrate that their child's academic needs are being met.

The home education law will finally respect parental rights in education.   Parents are assumed to be innocent until proven guilty of educational neglect. They won't have to prove themselves innocent annually. Given that 71% of all NH school districts are currently in need of improvement and none of those schools are being shut down, it's only equitable that home education programs are not terminated when a home education child might be in need of improvement.

Parents and public school teachers will be able to work together in the best interests of the child without fear of retribution should a child need remedial help.  No more threats of probation or termination of home programs. 

 

For more information on these bills, join NH Families for Education's Facebook group.

In the free society envisioned by the founders,

 ... schools are held accountable to parents, not state or federal governments.

 

CACR 12 is a radical departure from previous attitudes towards education in New Hampshire.

Previously literacy was "encouraged" to protect individuals from being led astray, or "deluded" by Satan under the Satan Deluder laws of 1647, and then later to insure that individuals could fully participate in a free society in Art. 6, Pt. 1 & Art. 83 Pt. 2 of NH Constitution in 1784.

This promoted Individualism.

CACR 12 promotes State control of education "for the benefit and welfare of the state."

Forget individualism.

Forget our constitutional right to independent local schools.

CACR 12 [Art.] 5-c [Public Education.] In fulfillment of the provisions with respect to education set forth in Part II, Article 83, the Legislature shall have the responsibility to maintain a system of public elementary and secondary education and to mitigate local disparities in educational opportunity and fiscal capacity. In the furtherance thereof, the Legislature shall have the full power and authority to make wholesome and reasonable standards for elementary and secondary public education and standards of accountability as it may judge for the benefit and welfare of the state and the full power and authority to make determinations as to the amount of, and the method of raising and distributing, state funding for public education as it may judge for the benefit and welfare of the state.


 

If you can't trust men to govern themselves,
how can you trust them to govern others?
Thomas Jefferson

 

Our free society will self destruct without trust between men and the presumption of innocence.  
 

Revised Amendments: CACR 8 and CACR 12

Instead of attempting to address both education funding reform and  curricula reform in a single Constitutional amendment, there's an effort underway to split the existing dual purpose amendments into two single-purpose amendments.   It's simpler and less controversial.

A revised CACR 12  would resolve education funding, without undermining local control or opening the door to a broad base tax.

A revised CACR 8 would restore local control and the "exclusive" right clause that disappeared in 1968, without including supplementary State funding, which did not belong in Part I of the NH Constitution, the Bill of Rights.

Here's the text of the two revised Constitutional amendments:

CACR 8 -- updated to address only local control:

[Art.] 6. [[Morality and Piety.]]

As morality and piety, rightly grounded on high principles, and inculcating the precepts of self-government embodied in this constitution, will give the best and greatest security to government, and will lay, in the hearts of men, the strongest obligations to due subjection; and as the knowledge of these is most likely to be propagated through a society by the establishment of schools; therefore, to promote these purposes, the people of this state have the right to empower, and do hereby fully empower the legislature to authorize from time to time, the people within the political subdivisions of this state to make provision, at their own expense, for the support and maintenance of teachers and schools.

Provided, notwithstanding, that all schools, public and non-public,
[the several parishes, bodies, corporate, or religious societies] shall at all times have the exclusive right of electing their own teachers, of contracting with them for their support [or] and maintenance, [or both.] and of defining and establishing their own curricula.

But no person shall ever be compelled to pay towards the support of the schools of any religious persuasion, sect or denomination. And every person, persuasion, denomination or sect shall be equally under the protection of the law; and no subordination of any one sect, denomination or persuasion to another shall ever be established.

 

CACR 12 -- updated to address only education funding reform:

[Art.] 5-c [Public Education.] "In fulfillment of the provisions with respect to education set forth in Part II, Article 83, the Legislature shall have the full power and authority to mitigate local disparities in educational opportunity and fiscal capacity.

In the advancement (or fulfillment) thereof, the Legislature shall have full power and authority to determine the amount of, and the method of raising and distributing, state funding for public education,  so long as such determinations and methods are not otherwise repugnant or contrary to this constitution." 

 

NH Families for Education supports these revisions.  If you agree with this concept, please ask Representatives and Senators to support this plan by contacting them as follows: hreps@leg.state.nh.us and Senators@leg.state.nh.us.
 

Homeschool Freedom Bill -- Please Contact the Senate Education Committee


HB 1571 eliminates the requirement for home educators to submit an annual evaluation with their participating agency.  It also eliminates probation and termination procedures that can be used against a home schooling family.  

This Homeschool Freedom bill protects the privacy rights of the child and creates a far less hostile atmosphere between districts and homeschooling families.  Parents will no longer have to fear repercussions should their child need remedial help in a subject, for instance. It will allow parents and district to work together constructively in the best interests of the child.

HB 1571 was unanimously passed out of the House Education Committee and then passed by the entire House.  It needs the support of the Senate and the signature of the governor to become law.  Please help support this homeschooling freedom bill!

 

ACTION NEEDED:

1. Contact the Senate Education Committee members as soon as possible.  Let these senators know that the current home education law is inequitable.  Living in fear under the presumption of guilt of educational neglect is a very heavy burden regardless what Department of Education worker Roberta Tenney claims.  No citizen should be deprived of their constitutional rights, including their right to privacy, due process and a presumption of innocence.

Nancy Stiles, Chair
nancy.stiles@leg.state.nh.us
271-6933
 
James Forsythe, Vice Chair
james.forsythe@leg.state.nh.us
271-3096
 
Sharon Carson
Sharon.Carson@leg.state.nh.us
271-2674
 
Russell Prescott
represcott@represcott.com
271-3074
642-4243


Molly Kelly
molly.kelly@leg.state.nh.us
271-2166
357-5118


2. Share this email with all of your homeschooling friends and neighbors.  Even if you are an underground homeschooler, you should contact the committee members.  I testified before the committee that I instructed my six children at home without complying the current law because it undermines my constitutional rights and would have jeopardized the instruction of my children.  Half the homeschooling community is underground.  This is not right. 

Citizens should not be afraid of their government because legislators refuse uphold the constitution that they took an oath to protect. 22 years of suffering under this inequitable law is enough.  Fix the home education law!

New Hampshire School Laws from the 1800's

The Laws of the State of New-Hampshire (1815)

Passed Dec. 28, 1805. An Act empowering school districts to build and repair school-houses, and regulating schools.

Sect. 1 Be it enacted by the senate and house of representatives, in general court convened, That the several towns and places within this state be, and they hereby are respectively empowered at any legal meeting for that purpose, to divide into school districts, and to define the limits thereof, and the same from time to time to alter in such manner as shall be thought fit and convenient; and a record of such division and alteration shall be make in the clerk's office of such town or place within three months after any such division or alteration shall have taken place; and no person shall have a right to send to, or receive any benefit from any school in a district where he is not a resident without the consent of such district.

Sect. 2. And be it further enacted, That the inhabitants of the several school districts, whose limits are or shall be defined as aforesaid, qualified to vote in town affairs, be, and they hereby are empowered, at any meeting called in the manner hereinafter prescribed, to raise money for the purposes of erecting, repairing or purchasing a school-house, in their respective districts, and of necessary utensils for the same; to determine in what part of the district to erect said school-house; to choose a committee to superintend the building and repairing of said school-house, or for purchasing the same; and to choose a clerk, who shall be sworn to a faithful discharge of the duties of his office; whoe duty it shall be to make a fair record of all votes passed at any meeting of the district, and to certify the same when required; and the money raised as aforesaid shall be assessed and collected in the manner as is hereinafter provided.

Sect. 3. And be it further enacted, That for the purposes aforesaid, every person shall be taxed in the district in which he lives for all the estate he holds in the town, being under his own actual improvement, and all other of his real estate in the same town, shall be taxed in the district in which it is included; and lands when the owner thereof lives without the town, shall be taxed in such district as the selectmen, having regard to the local situation thereof, shall appoint; and it shall be the duty of the selectmen before they assess a tax for any district, to determine in which district such lands respectively shall be taxed, and to certify in writing their determination to the clerk of the town, who shall record the same, and such land while owned by any person residing without the limits of the town, shall be taxed in such districts until the town shall be districted anew; Provided however, that all the lands within any town owned by the same person not living therein, shall be taxed in one and the same district;and the selectmen shall assess in the same manner as town taxes are assessed on the polls and estates of the inhabitants composing any school district defined as aforesaid, and on lands in said town, belonging to persons living out of the same, which the selectmen shall have directed to be taxed in such district, all monies voted to be raised by the inhabitants of such district for the purposes aforesaid, in thirty days after the clerk of the district shall certify to said selectmen the sum voted by the district to be raised aforesaid; and it shall be the duty of said selectmen to make a warrant directed to one of the collectors of the town to which such district belongs, empowering and requiring said collector to levy and collect the tax so assessed, and to pay the same within a time limted in said warrant, to the treasurer or selectmen of the town, to whom a certificate of the assessment shall be made by the assessors, and the money so collected and paid shall be at the disposal of the committee of the district, to be by them applied for the building, repairing or purchasing of a school-house in the district to which they belong; and such collector in collecting such tax, shall have the same powers, and be holded to proceed in the same manner as is by law provided in collecting town taxes.

Sect. 4. And be it further enacted, That the treasurer or selectmen of any town to whom a certificate of the assessment of a district tax shall be transmitted as aforesaid, shall have the same authority to enforce the collection and payment so assessed and certified as if the same had been voted to be raised by the town for the town's use.

Sect. 5. And be it further enacted, That it shall be the duty of the selectmen of the several towns and places divided in school districts as aforesaid, upon application made to them, in writing, by three or more freeholders resident within any school district in their respective towns, to issue their warrant directed to one of the persons making such application, requiring him to warn the inhabitants of such district, qualified to vote in town affairs, to meet at such time and place in the same district, as the selectmen shall in their warrant appoint; and the warning aforesaid, shall be by notifying personally every person in the district qualified to vote in town affairs, or by leaving at their usual places of abode a notifiation in writing, expressing therein the time, place and purpose of the meeting, ten days at least before the time appointed for holding the same; and any vote to raise money passed by a majority of the inhabitants of any school district present, at any district meeting holden pursuant to this act, shall be obligatory on the inhabitants of said district, to be assessed, levied and collected, as prescribed in this act.

Sect. 6. And be it further enacted, That if the inhabitants of any school district cannot agree where to erect a school-house for the accommodation of the same, the selectmen of the town to which such district belongs, upon application made to them by the committee of the district, are hereby authorized and empowered to determine on the place where a school-house, for the use and accommodation of the district, shall be erected.  Approved December 28, 1805.

 

Laws of New Hampshire: Second Constitutional Period, 1829-1835, pg. 476

Chapter 28 An Act in Amendment of an Act for the Support and Regulation of Primary Schools, Passed July 6, 1827.

Sec. 1.  Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court convened, That it shall be the duty of the Selectment of the several towns and places in this State, to assign to each school district in their respective towns and places a proportion of the money assessed in each year for the support of schools according to the valuation thereof for that year, unless the said towns and places shall at a meeting holden for the purpose direct it to be divided according to the number of scholars in each district.

Sec 2. And be it further enacted, That the second section of the second Act of which this is an amendment be and is hereby repealed.

The Compiled Statutes of the State of New Hampshire (1853), pg. 165

Chapter 73. Of the Creation and Division of School Districts.

Section 1.  Every town shall be divided by metes and bounds into so many districts as the public good requires, which shall be distinguished by suitable boundaries and include all the territory of the town.

Sec. 2. At any legal meeting for that purpose such division may be make by vote of the town, and the limits of such distrists defined and from time to time altered as convenience may require, a record of which shall be made.

Sec. 3. If any town shall neglect so to divide itself into school districts, the selectmen on application in writing by ten legal voters shall forthwith divide the town into districts, define their boundaries and cause a record thereof to be made by the town clerk within thirty days after such application. The town of Newington is exempted from this section.

Sec. 4. Every school district shall be a body politic and corporate, and may sue and be sued, take, hold, manage and convey real and personal property for the use of the district, and make and enforce all necessary contracts in relation thereto.

Sec. 5. Any town not divided as foresaid shall be considered, when necessary, as one district, and shall be entitled to all the rights and subject to all the liabilities of a town and of a district respectively.

Sec. 6. If the selectmen of any town shall neglect for six months after application make, to make a division as aforesaid, they shall forfeit a sum not exceeding one hundred dollars.

Sec. 7. When a new district is formed from one or more districts, the selectment upon the petition of a majority of the legal voters of such a new district, shall appraise all the property belonging to and all the debts due by each district so divided.

Sec. 8. If the property exceed the debts, the selectment shall assess upon the polls and ratable estate of that part of the district retaining such property, a reasonable sum not exceeding the proportion of the excess which the polls and ratable estates of the parts of the district so divided bear to each other, and shall assess and collect the same in the same manner as school house taxes, and cause the same to be paid over and applied for the use of such new district.

Sec. 9. Two or more continguous districts in adjoining towns may, upon such terms as they shall think proper, unite in the support of schools to be kept from year to year, so long as they agree, within either of such towns for the common benefit of such districts, and it shall be lawful for the purdential committees of such districts, so long as such union exists, to expend in the support of said schools the proportions of school money assigned to their respective districts by the selectmen of their respective towns.

Sed. 10. Each of the districts so uniting shall maintain its separate organization, and may raise money to build, repair, alter, remove and furnish a school house and other necessary buildings for their common use, although the same be not located within the district raising the money, and the money so raised shall be assessed and collected in the same maner as though it had been raised to build a school house within such district.

Sec. 11. When an execution shall issue against any school district, a copy thereof shall be left with one of the selectmen of the town, and the selectmen shall assess the inhabitants of such district in a sum sufficient to satisfy the same, and shall have the same authority in the collection thereof that they now have in the collection of town taxes.

Sec 12. The selectmen of two or more adjoining towns, on petition  of any member of any school district in either of said towns, may, by a majority of the selectment in each town,  disannex such member, together with his taxable property, for school purposes, from the district to which he belongs, and annex him to the some district of one of the adjoining towns.

Sec. 13. Such selectmen may, in like manner, on petition of persons interested, form a new school district by the union of inhabitants of such adjoining towns, and may, for this purpose set off individuals with their taxable property, from existing districts; and it shall be the duty of the selectmen to define the districts so formed, by metes and bounds, and to cause the same to be recorded in their respective towns, and the selectmen of the town first incorporated may call the first meeting of the district so formed.

Sec. 14. The selectmen of the town in which the school house is located shall have all the powers and are required to perfom all the duties in relation to filling vacancies in said district, that the selectmen of towns now have.

Sec. 15. Whenever a school district, composed of inhabitants of different towns, shall vote to raise money for the purpose of building, buying or repairing a school house, it shall be the duty of the clerk of said district to notify the selectmen of the several towns, in which the persons belonging to such district may reside, of the amount of money so voted to be raised, and it shall be the duty of the selectmen of each of said towns, thereupon, to assess upon the polls and ratable estate of such persons residing in their respective towns, their due proportion of the sums so voted to be raised, having regard to the entire inventory of all the inhabitants of said district, and to cause the same to be collected and paid over to the person authorized by the district to receive it.

Sec. 16. All persons who have been, or may hearafter be, severed from any school district in one town, and annexed to a school district in any other town, for the purpose of schooling, shall pay a just proportion for the purchase, building or repairing school houses in said districts, to which they are or may be annexed.

Sec. 17. Whenever any such district shall vote to raise money, the clerk of said district shall certify such vote to the selectmen of each of said towns; and said selectmen shall form a joint board for the purpose of assessing upon the polls and ratable estate in said district the due proportion of said money; and each board of selectmen shall commit to the collectors of thwir respective towns the taxes by them so assessed in their respective towns, to be collected and paid over to the person or persons by said district authorized to receive the same, to be applied and accounted for according to law.

Sec. 18. All persons who have been, or hereafter may be, severed from any school district in one town and annexed to a school district  in any other town for the purpose of schooling, shall have and enjoy all the rights and privileges in regard to the literary and school funds of every description, to which they would have been entitled if they had not be so disannexed or united. And whenever the real estate of any person shall be disannexed for the purposes aforesaid, the polls and ratable estate of all persons residing or having their home on said real estate, on the first day of April of each year, shall also be considered as disannexed, and their proportion of the literary and school fund shall be paid over to the prudential school committee of the district to which said real estate has been annexed. It shall be the duty of the selectmen of the town from which any person or persons may be disannexed as aforesaid, to pay over the proportion of the literary and school fund as aforesaid to the prudential school committee as aforesaid, on or before the first day of February, annually.

Sec. 19. The town of Pittsburg and the town of Bartlett are exempt from the provisions of the law of this State in regard ot the division of the town into school districs, and the selectment thereof, respectively, may divide said towns or any part thereof, into as many school districts  as they may deem just, and cause a record thereof to be made in the records of said town, which districts shall have all the rights and privilges and be subject to all the liabilities of other school districts in the State.

"District System" Established in New Hampshire in 1805

 

New Hampshire Register, State Year-book and Legislative Manual (1873), pg. 74

"Previous to 1805 the District System was unknown.  That year an act was passed empowering towns to divide into school districts.  The statute of 1827 ordered the sub-division of towns into school districts. The act of 1843 required that sub-division under severe penalty."

 

Annual Report upon the Common Schools of New Hampshire (1855), pg.CCLXXXV

COUNTY       # SCHOOL DISTRICTS

Coos                  125

Sullivan              171

Grafton             416

Hillsborough      324

Cheshire            232

Carroll               202

Belknap              157

Merrimack         293

Rockingham        227

Strafford           140

TOTAL        2,267

 

The compiled statutes of the state of New Hampshire (1853)

Ch 73: Of the Creation and Division of School Districts, pg. 167

Sec 12. The selectmen of two or more adjoining towns, on petition of any member of any school district in either of said towns, may, by a majority of the selectment in each town, disannex such member, together with his taxable property, for school purposes,  from the district to which he belongs, and annex him to one of the adjoining towns. 

Sec. 13. Such selectmen may, in like manner, on petition of persons interested, form a new school district by the union of inhabitants of such adjoining towns, and may, for this purpose set off individuals with their taxable property, from existing districts; and it shall be the dury of the selectmen to define the districts so formed, by metes and bounds, and to cause the same to be recorded in their respective towns, and the selectmen of the town first incorporated may call the first meeting of the district so formed.
 

The general statutes of the State of New-Hampshire (1867), pg. 162-177

The Governor and his Council were the first NH Board of Education; they hired a Superintendent (two year term), who "shall visit, as often as his other duties will permit, different parts of the state for the purpose of awakening and guiding public sentiment in relation to the practical interests of education" p. 175

The superintendent "shall collect in his office such school-books, apparatus, maps, and charts as can be obtained without expense to the state." p. 175‎

"Towns not divided into school districts may be so divided by vote of the town." p. 163‎

"If any three or more of the voters of a district ar aggrieved by the location of any school-house by the district or its committee, they may apply by petition  to the school committee, who shall hear and determine the location thereof." p. 167

New Hampshire Register, State Year-book and Legislative Manual (1873), pg. 74

By 1872 there were 234 towns in New Hampshire with 2,284 School Districts and 2,452 schools.  Daily attendance statewide was 67% of the total number of registered students, which was 72,762. The number of students not attending school at all was 4,602, which is less then 6%. 

The first compulsory attendance law was passed in 1871 in New Hampshire.

Currently there are 94 School Districts in New Hampshire with a much larger student population.  This consolidation, or centralization, of school districts, along with the advent of state and federal mandates, have undermined the ability of parents to control their schools within their local communities.

The restoration of the District System would provide parents with school choice. Parents could petition to join or leave a school district, or even establish a new school district.  Districts would be smaller and more responsive to the local community. State and federal mandates have no role in the District System.

 

 

Legislative Opportunities Event - for Families and Interested Individuals!

 

Monday, April 2nd, in Legislative Office Building, Room 210-211, from 1:00 - 4:00 pm

Legislative Office Building (Behind the State House)

33 North Street, Room 210-2011

Concord, NH  03301

 

Learn how to

 Navigate the Legislative Process
Help Pass the Driver Ed Bill into Law
Know what's Going on in Concord
Testify Effectively in front of Committees
Make Persuasive Arguments to Advance Your Issues
Consider Serving as a State Representative


Speakers include:

 Hon. Don Gorman
Hon. John Burt
Hon. Laura Jones
Hon. Kyle Jones


 
Bring a friend, your questions and a pen and pad to take notes!

See you there!
 

For additional information call Rep. Laura Jones.

--
State Rep. Laura Jones
Strafford 1 - Rochester, NH
http://www.Jones4StateRep.com <http://www.jones4staterep.com/>
(603) 948-2264

 

Please Oppose State Controlled Education (CACR 12); Respect Parental Rights (CACR 31); and Restore Local Control (CACR 8)

NH Families for Education is asking Legislators to oppose CACR 12:  it Empowers the State Legislature, Undermines Local Control, and Tramples Parental Rights. 

Rep. Paul Mirski warned the House on March 14th that the Senate revised language, which includes the word "responsibility,"  makes Charter schools unconstitutional and mandates State curricula. 

House Attorney Ed Mosca advised Rep. JR Hoell that the Senate language, which includes the word "responsibility,"  makes the recently passed HB 542 unconstitutional.  Parents would no longer have the right to remove their child or "opt-out" of objectionable material in a public schools under CACR 12.  Their rights of conscience will be overruled by CACR 12.

Even without the inclusion of the word "responsibility," CACR 12 grants the Legislature "full power and authority" to mandate curricula, eliminate Local Control, and trample Parental Rights.  It is absurd to believe that a Legislature with  "full power and authority" would actually restrain itself and not exercise that power. 

Given that CACR 12 is being seriously considered by this Legislature is causing many parents to become anxious and concerned.  They believe a Parental Rights Amendment, CACR 31, is needed to protect and guarantee their right to direct and control the education of their children.  It is unacceptable to compel a parent to send a child to public school where the State Legislature may mandate curricula in direct opposition to his conscientious beliefs.

Please vote against State Controlled Education in CACR 12.

Support the Parental Rights Amendment, CACR 31, and Restore Local Control of Education, CACR 8 .

“In New Hampshire the rights of parents over the family are considered “natural, essential and inherent rights within the meaning of the New Hampshire Constitution, Part I, Article 2.” In re Diana P., 120 N.H. 791, 798, 424 A.2d 178, 182 (1980).

“Thus parents enjoy a constitutionally protected right to raise their children as they see fit, unfettered by undue state intrusion.” State v. Robert H., 118 N.H. 713, 716, 393, A.2d 1387, 1389 (1978).

Empower the State (CACR 12) or the People (CACR 8)? It's Your Decision.

CACR 12 was written by lawyers to settle a dispute between the Courts and the Legislature. It undermines local control and opens the door to any "method" of taxation needed. That's a risky proposition.

CACR 8 is a much safer amendment. It's resolves the Claremont dispute without relinquishing local control. It simply restores constitutional language that was removed in 1968 without public debate. Municipalities will once again enjoy the "exclusive" right to control their local schools. Since 1784 the constitution guaranteed the political independence of towns and the cities from State interference.

Please restore our constitution with CACR 8, The People's Amendment!

The lawyers that support CACR 12 do not understand the difference between the NH and MA Constitution any more than the Claremont Court did when it copied the MA McDuffy education funding decision.  The duty of "LEGISLATORS" as individuals in NH Pt. 2, Art. 83 is quite different from the duty of the "LEGISLATURE" as a collective body in MA.  Our NH founders deliberately changed this language to diminish the possibility of State control of education.  Unfortunately, today's lawyers demean the literal meaning of the words and conflate the two constitutions to support their desired end.

Moreover, Pt. 1, Art. 6 of the NH Constitution guarantees local control, or political independence, of public instruction regardless of whether our schools are funded by the towns or churches.  The lawyers fail to mention these inalienable rights of conscience when they plead the necessity of State control of schools.

CACR 12 usurps Pt. 1, Art. 6 and is a grant of power to the State in conformity to the Court-fabricated duty of the LEGISLATURE to define and fund an adequate education for public schools, but somehow overlooks "seminaries," or universities, which are also to be equally "cherished." It's far more important to mold the youth.

It is laughable, if it weren't so tragic.  Many of the first settlers in New Hampshire left England to avoid the English parliament's Acts of Uniformity; some left other American colonies to avoid the persecution of State controlled public instruction.  These settlers deliberately wrote a constitution to protect this inalienable right "for all times." Yet, CACR 12  casually undermines all of this and recreates the same form of State controlled instruction, or indoctrination, from which our predecessors fled.


 

Supporters of CACR 12 are Deliberately Misleading the Public: CACR 12 Does NOT "Restore Local Control."

CACR 12 does not restore local control.  It does the opposite: it grants the State control over public schools.

Here's a copy of the text:

[Art.] 5-c [Public Education.] In fulfillment of the provisions with respect to education set forth in Part II, Article 83,

The opening line refers to the Claremont decision, which elevated "cherish" to mean "State funded and controlled."

the legislature shall have full power and authority and the responsibility to define reasonable standards for elementary and secondary public education, to establish reasonable standards of accountability, and to mitigate local disparities in educational opportunity and fiscal capacity.

This is a grant of power to the State legislature, undermining our constitutional guarantee of political independence from the State with regard to public instruction, public or private, "at all times." 

Further, the legislature shall have full power and authority to determine the amount of, and the method of raising and distributing, state funding for public education.

Any method of taxation chosen by the State legislature would be possible under CACR 12.

 

The language is very clear.  Yet, look at what supporters are claiming:

February 1, 2012

[Ovide] Lamontagne Releases Statement on CACR 12 Passing Senate Comm.

The amended language contained in CACR 12 which the Senate Internal Affairs Committee approved today contains a very reasonable approach in returning local control over education funding while allowing the Legislature to direct targeted aid to disadvantaged school districts. As former State Board of Education Chair and a party to the original Claremont lawsuits, I have led on this issue, understanding how important it is to pass a constitutional amendment, and restore local control. I am grateful that the leadership in both the House and Senate have made education funding a priority and put a great deal of time into addressing this issue.  I believe that the language approved today can achieve our common objectives in finally restoring local control of education policy and funding, while attracting broad bi-partisan support, which I hope includes the support of Governor Lynch, in November."

 

Foster's Daily Democrat on March 9, 2012

"Unfinished business -- Education funding"

by Sen. Jeb Bradley

— What would CACR-12 do and not do? Why is CACR-12 so vital for New Hampshire's future?

Most importantly, CACR-12 would put state and
local elected leaders in charge of education funding decisions as well as providing the criteria for a quality education so necessary for students in an increasingly competitive world.....

Furthermore CACR-12 restores local control to school boards. The language of CACR-12 provides that the Legislature sets education standards and ensures accountability of those standards.

Is this a state takeover of education? No! New Hampshire is not constitutionally a 'Home Rule State' and since 1963 New Hampshire has set minimum education standards, determining minimum classroom size, teacher student ratios etc. CACR-12 does not change the historical dynamic between Concord and NH communities nor will CACR-12 in anyway impact home schooling.



Why are supporters of CACR 12 deliberately misleading the people ?

The State legislature has been usurping local contol by setting minimum standards since 1963 without any Constitutional authority to do so.  That's illegal! 

If the State legislature can overstep its Constitutional authority with impunity, who knows what they'll do with additional power.  Any private school, which receives State funding for buses, lunches or special needs, could be subject to increased regulation under CACR 12.  Home school are already regulated under public and private schools; their accountability to the State can only increase under CACR 12.  Don't listen to the supporters of CACR 12 when they tell you otherwise, because they're deliberately misleading the public.

The State legislature does not deserve any additional power or authority!  The people should restrict the State legislature to prevent further erosion of their rights!

Syndicate content

User login